¿Por qué nosotros no? Acción Ciudadana por la Salud y el cambio de la Ley Española de Tabaco

Australia's Gross-Out Cigarett

09/10/2012 David Fickling

Remember when a pack of smokes came with glitzy logos, rich foil sleeves, and romanticized language about the pleasures within? The future of cigarette packs is now on display in Australia, and it’s not romantic: large, graphic images of gangrenous limbs and cancer victims, with brand names printed in a uniform font on a background legally mandated as “drab dark brown.”

Tobacco products complying with the world’s first plain-packaging laws started arriving in Australia’s stores around Oct. 1, when the country’s A$10 billion ($10.37 billion) tobacco industry was hit with strict constraints on how it can package and sell cigarettes. Similar regulations, backed by the World Health Organization, are being weighed in the U.K., New Zealand, Turkey, and the EU. “With so many countries lined up to ride on Australia’s coattails, what we hope to see is a domino effect for the good of public health,” Margaret Chan, the WHO’s director general, said in a statement.

Government inspectors will be closely scrutinizing packs over the next two months, on the lookout for even small deviations from the stylebook, says Simon Crittle, a spokesman for Plibersek. Health officials had already slammed the packaging of some cigarette makers who tried photos that weren’t grisly enough shortly before the imposition of the new rules. “The images that had appeared on some of the packs—graphic health warnings, photos of people with gangrene—weren’t as sharp as they could have been,” Crittle says. “The reds weren’t as red as they should be.”

Mandatory picture warnings were first introduced in Canada in 2001. They now have been rolled out in 47 countries, including Brazil, the Philippines, Turkey, and Ukraine among the world’s top 10 cigarette markets, according to the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance. Australia’s rollout is being watched because the barring of almost all branding goes further than rules in other nations. Similar regulations in the U.S. have been stalled by a federal appeals court ruling in August.

The packaging laws are among several measures, including a 25 percent tax increase, intended to cut the prevalence of smokers from the current 15 percent of Australians to 10 percent by 2018. About 15,000 Australians die from tobacco-related diseases annually, with social and economic costs of about A$32 billion a year, the government reports.

The High Court of Australia in August dismissed a claim by British American Tobacco (BTI), Philip Morris (MO), Imperial Tobacco, and Japan Tobacco International that the law illegally seizes their intellectual property by banning the display of trademarks. Appeals have also been lodged by Honduras, Ukraine, and the Dominican Republic at the World Trade Organization, claiming the law restricts the tobacco trade.

Cigarette makers are right to fear the regulations, says David Hammond, an expert in tobacco rules at the University of Waterloo in Canada: “Once tobacco control measures are established in one country, they spread.”

The bottom line: Australia has started requiring plain packaging and graphic health warnings on products produced by its $10 billion tobacco industry.

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-10-04/australias-gross-out-cigarette-warnings

4 comments
 

Comments

Author: DdfpZxVRmcMtBv Publish: 31/10/2012 3:47:38

iugxK6 , [url=http://jtgypdzhgdag.com/]jtgypdzhgdag[/url], [link=http://tkoabdjoqelt.com/]tkoabdjoqelt[/link], http://ofyqxnhlphcy.com/

Author: lAXDzafwzmvPfEOw Publish: 30/10/2012 10:44:12

3fRkZz , [url=http://fxjjnlwgjhfn.com/]fxjjnlwgjhfn[/url], [link=http://kvrdrngqqltt.com/]kvrdrngqqltt[/link], http://qeojloxuqsao.com/

Author: elykGxaplhCEWwxkGdt Publish: 28/10/2012 22:00:46

f8Smfk <a href="http://mutezapfgoyu.com/">mutezapfgoyu</a>

Author: SPkkFTmG Publish: 28/10/2012 15:22:39

And if the tobacco conaemips were really fighting the anti-smokers, they would have demolished the anti-smokers' scientific fraud. The anti-smokers commit flagrant scientific fraud by ignoring more than 50 studies which show that human papillomaviruses cause at least 1/4 of non-small cell lung cancers. Smokers and passive smokers are more likely to have been exposed to this virus for socioeconomic reasons. And the anti-smokers' studies are all based on lifestyle questionnaires, so they're cynically DESIGNED to blame tobacco for all those extra lung cancers that are really caused by HPV. And they commit the same type of fraud with every disease they blame on tobacco.And, all their so-called independent reports were ring-led by the same guy, Jonathan M. Samet, including the Surgeon General Reports, the EPA report, the IARC report, and the ASHRAE report, and he's now the chairman of the FDA Committee on Tobacco. He and his politically privileged clique exclude all the REAL scientists from their echo chamber. That's how they make their reports unanimous! For the government to commit fraud to deprive us of our liberties is automatically a violation of our Constitutional rights to the equal protection of the laws, just as much as if it purposely threw innocent people in prison. And for the government to spread lies about phony smoking dangers is terrorism, no different from calling in phony bomb threats.

Your opinion



    

©2012 All Rights Reserved

Logo Visiona E-SolutionsDesarrollado por